Effective cash and liquidity management are at the core of corporate treasury functions, and one of the critical decisions treasury professionals face is whether to outsource short-term investment strategies or manage them in-house. This decision can significantly impact the company’s risk management, return on investments, and operational efficiency.

For aspiring Certified Treasury Professionals (CTPs), understanding the pros and cons of both approaches—outsourcing vs. in-house management— is essential to making strategic decisions that align with the organization’s financial goals, liquidity needs, and risk tolerance.

In this blog, we’ll explore the key factors that treasury professionals need to consider when deciding whether to keep short-term investment strategies in-house or outsource them.

The Role of Short-Term Investments in Treasury Management

Short-term investments play a vital role in helping treasury professionals optimize the use of idle cash, maintain liquidity, and generate returns without exposing the company to excessive risk. These investments are typically made in liquid, low-risk instruments such as money market funds, treasury bills, certificates of deposit (CDs), or commercial paper with maturities of less than one year.

The goal is to ensure that the company can meet its immediate financial obligations while still earning some return on surplus funds. Treasury professionals must balance the need for liquidity with the potential for earning higher yields on short-term investments.

Outsourcing Short-Term Investment Strategies

Outsourcing short-term investment management involves hiring a third-party asset manager or financial institution to handle the company’s investment portfolio. This approach is particularly common for organizations that lack the internal resources or expertise to actively manage their own investment strategies.

Benefits of Outsourcing

Expertise and Specialization Outsourcing short-term investments to a professional asset manager provides access to specialized expertise. Asset managers often have in-depth knowledge of market conditions, access to sophisticated investment tools, and the ability to make informed decisions based on market trends.

Example: A treasury professional working at a mid-sized company may find that their team lacks the deep market insights needed to maximize returns on short-term investments. By outsourcing to an expert, the company can benefit from a more robust investment strategy.

Time Efficiency Managing short-term investments can be time-consuming, requiring continuous monitoring of markets and active portfolio management. Outsourcing allows treasury professionals to focus on core treasury functions, such as liquidity management, cash flow forecasting, and risk mitigation, while a third-party manager takes care of the investment strategy.

Access to Resources Outsourcing to a large asset management firm can give companies access to investment opportunities and products that might not be available to smaller in-house teams. These firms may offer better pricing, execution, and access to higher-quality investment products.

Risk Management Professional asset managers are experienced in managing risk and may have the tools and strategies to mitigate market volatility, credit risk, or interest rate risk more effectively than an in-house team with limited resources.

Downsides of Outsourcing

Cost Outsourcing can be expensive, as asset managers typically charge management fees based on the assets under management. These fees can eat into the returns generated by short-term investments.

Example: A company may find that after paying the management fees, the net return on their investments is lower than what they could have achieved by managing the investments in-house.

Loss of Control Outsourcing means that the company must relinquish some control over investment decisions. Treasury professionals may have less flexibility in responding to sudden changes in market conditions or adjusting the investment strategy based on the company’s evolving liquidity needs.

Alignment with Corporate Objectives While third-party managers aim to generate returns, they may not always prioritize the specific liquidity requirements or risk tolerance of the company. There’s a risk that the outsourced strategy may not align perfectly with the company’s financial goals.

Managing Short-Term Investments In-House

In-house management of short-term investments involves the company’s treasury team directly handling the investment portfolio. This approach gives treasury professionals complete control over investment decisions, including asset selection, risk management, and liquidity strategies.

Benefits of In-House Management

Greater Control In-house management allows treasury professionals to retain full control over the company’s investment portfolio. This flexibility ensures that investment decisions align perfectly with the company’s liquidity needs, risk tolerance, and strategic objectives.

Example: A treasury professional at a company experiencing volatile cash flows may need to adjust the investment strategy frequently to maintain liquidity. Managing the investments in-house allows for more agile decision-making.

Cost Savings By managing short-term investments internally, companies can avoid paying management fees to external asset managers. This can lead to higher net returns on investments, especially for companies with experienced treasury teams capable of making informed investment decisions.

Customization Treasury professionals can customize the investment strategy to fit the unique requirements of their organization. They can choose investment instruments that align with specific risk parameters and time horizons, ensuring that the portfolio is tailored to the company’s specific needs.

Transparency In-house management provides full visibility into the investment portfolio, ensuring that the treasury team has real-time information on the performance of assets and can make adjustments quickly if necessary.

Downsides of In-House Management

Resource Intensive Managing short-term investments requires time, expertise, and resources. Smaller treasury teams may not have the bandwidth to actively manage a portfolio, which can result in missed opportunities or insufficient risk management.

Lack of Expertise Without the specialized expertise of a professional asset manager, an in-house treasury team may not be as well-equipped to navigate complex market conditions, evaluate investment opportunities, or manage risks like interest rate changes or credit events.

Limited Access In-house teams may have limited access to certain investment products or pricing advantages that are available to larger asset management firms. This can restrict the variety of investments available, potentially lowering returns or increasing risk.

Key Factors to Consider

Aspiring CTPs need to carefully weigh the decision between outsourcing and in-house management by considering the following factors:

• Company Size and Resources Larger companies with dedicated treasury teams and sophisticated financial tools may benefit from keeping short-term investment strategies in-house. Smaller companies with limited resources may find outsourcing to be a more practical solution.
• Cost vs. Return Treasury professionals must assess whether the potential cost savings from in-house management outweigh the benefits of outsourcing to experienced professionals. For some companies, the management fees paid to asset managers are justified by the higher returns they can generate.
• Risk Tolerance The company’s risk tolerance should play a key role in this decision. Outsourced asset managers may have more sophisticated risk management strategies, but in-house teams may have a deeper understanding of the company’s unique risk appetite and liquidity needs.
• Complexity of Investments For companies with simple cash management needs, in-house management may be sufficient. However, for companies with complex cash flow cycles or a need to invest in specialized instruments, outsourcing can provide access to more sophisticated strategies and products.

In Conclusion. . .

For aspiring Certified Treasury Professionals, the decision to outsource or keep short-term investment strategies in-house is a critical one that affects the company’s liquidity, risk profile, and profitability. Both approaches offer distinct advantages and drawbacks, and treasury professionals must evaluate their organization’s resources, expertise, and financial goals to make the right choice.

Outsourcing offers expertise, time efficiency, and access to resources but comes with higher costs and a loss of control.

In-house management provides greater flexibility, cost savings, and control but requires significant resources, expertise, and time commitment.

Ultimately, aspiring CTPs should aim to develop a deep understanding of both models, as the best approach may change over time based on the company’s financial landscape and strategic goals. By mastering the intricacies of short-term investment strategies, treasury professionals can enhance their ability to maximize returns while maintaining the necessary liquidity to meet operational needs.

Matt D.

See Full Bio